Answer :
Final answer:
c. Private healthcare in the U.S. leads to shorter wait times and more advanced technologies.
The author's main argument in support of the U.S. healthcare system over the UK's is that the private U.S. healthcare results in shorter wait times and access to advanced medical technologies, making option c the correct choice.
Explanation:
The author's main argument in favor of the U.S. healthcare system compared to the UK is that the private nature of the U.S. healthcare system leads to shorter wait times for services and access to more advanced technologies. The text provides insight that while the U.S. system has its challenges with high costs and ensuring basic medical care for all, it excels in delivering high-quality care and medical innovations.
In contrast, countries with public healthcare systems might have lower costs, more equal access, and better mortality outcomes but can struggle to match the U.S. in terms of the speed of healthcare delivery and the adoption of cutting-edge medical technologies. Therefore, the correct answer to the question is that private healthcare in the U.S. leads to shorter wait times and more advanced technologies, option c.
Despite the private nature of the U.S. healthcare system, it's noted that achieving a healthcare system that balances quality, access, and cost is a significant challenge. The U.S. system is a leading example of private healthcare offering cutting edge treatments quickly, but at high costs, unlike the UK's system, which is more focused on the broader, cost-effective access but might lack the same level of innovation and speed.
