Answer :
Final answer:
An appellate judge who disagrees with both the reasoning of the majority opinion and the dissenting opinion writes a dissenting opinion. This opinion presents an alternative view of the case's facts and law, separate from the majority and dissenting views.
Explanation:
When an appellate judge disagrees with both the majority opinion and the dissenting opinion's reasoning, he or she may write what is known as a dissenting opinion (option d). A dissenting opinion presents an alternative interpretation or view of the law and facts of the case, distinct from the views espoused in the majority and dissenting opinions.
A concurring opinion occurs when a judge agrees with the decision of the majority, but for different reasons. A memorandum opinion is a brief opinion of the court that announces the result but doesn't provide reasoning. Lastly, a partially dissenting opinion is an opinion in which the judge agrees with the majority for part of the ruling but disagrees on other aspects.
Learn more about Dissenting Opinion here:
https://brainly.com/question/32039533
#SPJ11