Answer :
Final answer:
When a Supreme Court justice votes opposite the majority, they may write a dissenting opinion. This opinion articulates their disagreement and reasoning. It plays a key role in influencing future legal interpretations and discussions.
Explanation:
Understanding Judicial Opinions
When a Supreme Court justice votes opposite of the majority, he/she may write a dissenting opinion. This opinion represents the views of the justices who do not agree with the majority's decision. It is important because it provides a legal reasoning for disagreeing with the ruling and can influence future legal interpretations.
In contrast, a concurring opinion is written by justices who agree with the majority but for different reasons. The precedent established by the majority opinion is binding in lower courts, while dissenting opinions can offer insights into potential future rulings or highlight issues that may not have been fully addressed.
Learn more about Supreme Court Opinions here:
https://brainly.com/question/37564401
