High School

Two technicians are discussing a state emission test.

Technician A says that a vent valve that is not able to close can cause the system to fail the on-board test.

Technician B says that a leaking gas cap can cause a failure of the EVAP test.

Which technician is correct?

Answer :

Both technicians are correct about the causes of emission test failures. A non-closing vent valve or a leaking gas cap can both lead to a failed EVAP system test in state emissions testing, highlighting the need for proper vehicle maintenance.

Both technicians are correct in their assessments concerning the causes of potential failures in state emission tests. Technician A is right in saying that a vent valve that cannot close properly could lead to a failure of the on-board test. This is because the Evaporative Emission Control System, or EVAP, relies on this valve to seal the fuel system and prevent vapors from escaping into the atmosphere when the vehicle is not running. If this vent valve fails to close, it might allow these harmful vapors to leak, which typically triggers a check engine light and can lead to a failed emission test.

Technician B's claim about a leaking gas cap is also valid. The gas cap is a critical component of the EVAP system as it maintains a closed environment, ensuring no fuel vapors escape. A leaking or poorly fitting gas cap can result in the EVAP system failing to pressurize properly, thereby signaling a leak that will emerge during a pressurization test. This could cause the vehicle's Onboard Diagnostics (OBD) system to record a fault that triggers a failed EVAP test during emissions testing.

These precarious scenarios underscore the importance of proper vehicle maintenance and component functionality to comply with state emission testing regulations. As learned from the Volkswagen emissions scandal, any device or component that causes false readings or does not perform as intended can bring about severe consequences, including failed emission tests and potential legal repercussions due to non-transparency and environmental violations.

Both technicians are correct.