Answer :
Final answer:
The standard of proof to convict a juvenile changed from a preponderance of the evidence to beyond a reasonable doubt in the 1960s in the United States. This change established a higher bar of proof, better protecting the rights of the accused.
Explanation:
In the United States, the standard of proof to convict a juvenile changed from B) Preponderance of the evidence to proof beyond a reasonable doubt in the 1960s. This means that previously, it required only more likelihood than not or a balance of probabilities to consider someone guilty. However, with the change, it now requires the government to prove that there's no plausible reason to believe otherwise, that the accused has certainly committed the crime, thereby ensuring a greater level of protection for the accused's rights. These principles form the foundation of our judicial system in the context of the rule of law, and due process.
Learn more about Juvenile Convictions here:
https://brainly.com/question/33708190
#SPJ11
