Answer :
From a traditional natural law perspective, the view that artificial insemination is unethical due to technological alteration of human reproduction can be considered true, aligning with the belief that procreation should occur within the context of marital relations without intervention. However, opinions on this matter can vary, with some feminist perspectives either supporting or critiquing reproductive technologies based on empowerment or potential reinforcement of male dominance.
The statement that the natural law perspective views artificial insemination as unethical because it involves technologically altering how human sexual reproduction occurs can be considered true from a traditional natural law standpoint, which often values procreation within the specific context of marital sexual relations and views technological intervention as interfering with the natural order. However, different ethical frameworks might disagree, and perspectives on this issue can vary widely.
In the context of the natural law perspective, particularly as interpreted by some religious traditions, reproduction is seen as inherently linked to the marital relationship, and any intervention that separates procreation from the marital act can be viewed as inconsistent with this viewpoint. Consequently, techniques like artificial insemination may be deemed unacceptable within this framework.
It's important to note that there are contrasting opinions on this topic. Other ethical perspectives, including feminist viewpoints, have differing stances on reproductive technologies like artificial insemination, with some arguing that it empowers infertile women, while others contend it may reinforce male dominance.
