High School

Ted frequently visited Janet, his next-door neighbor. Janet was separated from her husband, Howard. Howard resided with his mother, but jointly owned the house in which Janet resided. late one night, Ted and Janet were sitting on the bed in Janet's bedroom drinking when Howard burst through the door and told Ted, "Get out." When Ted refused, Howard challenged him to go outside and "fight it out." Ted again refused. Howard then pulled knife from his pocket and lunged at Ted. Ted grabbed a lamp, struck Howard on the head, and killed him. Ted is charged with murder. On a charge of murder, Ted should be found

(A) not guilty, because Ted had as much right as Howard to be in the house.

(B) not guilty, because Howard attacked Ted with a deadly weapon.

(C) guilty, because Ted's presence in Janet's bedroom prompted Howard's attack.

(D) guilty, because Ted's failure to obey Howard's order to leave the house made him a trespasser.

Answer :

Final answer:

Ted should be found not guilty, as he acted in self-defense against a deadly weapon.

Explanation:

Ted should be found not guilty, because Howard attacked Ted with a deadly weapon.

Under the principle of self-defense, individuals have the right to protect themselves from imminent harm. In this case, Ted acted in self-defense when Howard lunged at him with a knife.

Ted's presence in Janet's bedroom or his refusal to leave the house does not make him guilty of murder. The key factor is Howard's aggressive action towards Ted, which justified Ted's use of force to preserve his own safety.

Learn more about Self-defense here:

https://brainly.com/question/31941868

#SPJ11