Read the paragraph from “Drones Put Spying Eyes in the Sky.”

"About 100 years ago, rhinos were plentiful in Africa and Asia. But because of extreme poaching, some species have gone extinct. The five remaining species are all endangered, and people like Snitch are trying to catch the poachers before the animals vanish. Most rhinos are poached from Kruger National Park. But during the week that Snitch and his team spent testing the drone, no rhinos died in the area."

What type of flawed reasoning is used in the paragraph?

A. False cause and effect
B. Hasty generalization
C. Shifting the burden of proof
D. Argument from ignorance

The paragraph uses flawed reasoning by assuming a false cause and effect relationship between the presence of a drone and the absence of rhino deaths without considering other variables.

Explanation:

The flawed reasoning used in the paragraph from “Drones Put Spying Eyes in the Sky” is that of a false cause and effect.

This logical fallacy assumes a relationship of causation based on correlation or sequence of events. In the provided text, it is implied that because no rhinos were poached in the area during the week that Snitch and his team tested the drone, the drone's presence was the reason for this outcome.

However, this is a flawed conclusion because it does not account for other variables that could have influenced the outcome. There is no clear evidence provided that directly links the use of the drone to the absence of rhino deaths in that particular week.

Anj17 Anj17 · Answer 2 · 2024-10-20T01:28:18-04:00

The type of flawed reasoning is used in the paragraph false cause and effect

Because Snitch uses drones to pursue and drive away poachers who are seeking to hunt endangered species. Snitch uses drones as surveillance equipment to safeguard endangered animals, which is a false cause and effect

In false cause and effect you make a logical error by flawed reasoning when you claim that because event A occurred just before event B, event A must have caused event B. This means that, since the two occurrences are correlated, causality must therefore be assumed. A flawed reasoning perceived connection between two items that doesn't always suggest that one is the reason for the other might also be considered in this context.

This is obviously a flawed assumption happens because correlation doesn't necessarily indicate causation. It is true, nevertheless, that there are situations when the connection results from underlying causative factors, but this can only be determined by further investigation.

To know more about flawed:

https://brainly.com/question/13678901

#SPJ1