Answer :
Juror 11 disagrees with Juror 4's reasoning because he believes that it is too focused on the defendant's background and not on the evidence presented in the case.
Juror 11 argues that the defendant's past should not influence their decision, and that they should only consider the facts presented in court. It is difficult to say which theory is more likely, as it ultimately depends on the individual's interpretation of the evidence presented in the case.
However, the American justice system generally operates under the principle of "innocent until proven guilty," and as such, it is the prosecution's responsibility to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, it is important for jurors to focus on the evidence presented in court and not on personal biases or assumptions about the defendant's background. Ultimately, it is up to each juror to carefully consider all of the evidence presented and make an informed decision based on the facts of the case.
To know more about the Reasoning, here
https://brainly.com/question/30662500
#SPJ1
