Answer :
Final answer:
The difference in sucking reflex strength between Mike and Ted likely indicates that they are unique individuals, with the variations being part of normal newborn behavior. A weaker sucking reflex might call for a medical evaluation but does not imply laziness or disinterest in breastfeeding. The correct option is a.
Explanation:
The difference in sucking reflex strength between Mike and Ted most likely indicates that they are unique individuals. Newborn reflexes such as the sucking and grasp reflex are designed to help a baby feed and survive.
While these reflexes, such as the sucking reflex, typically occur automatically in newborns and are necessary for feeding, variations in strength do not necessarily mean that a baby is lazy or dislikes breastfeeding.
Ted's weaker sucking reflex may indicate a need for medical evaluation to rule out any underlying issues, but differences in reflex strength alone are part of normal variation among newborns. Option a. is the correct one.