Answer :
Final answer:
To ensure the reliability of scientific claims, results must be peer-reviewed and replicated. The microscope enhances data gathering in investigations. Maintaining constant variables is crucial during experiments, and both scientific laws and theories describe observable events in nature.
Explanation:
Understanding Scientific Claims
If a company claims that its product has been proven scientifically, it is critical that certain standards of scientific practice have been met for the results to be considered reliable. The most appropriate response is:
- C. Results should have been peer reviewed and repeated producing the same findings. This is essential in science because peer review helps to ensure that the research is valid and that the results can be replicated by other scientists, confirming their accuracy.
The Role of the Microscope in Scientific Investigation
The invention of the microscope significantly advanced the following stage of scientific investigation:
- B. Gathering the data for the investigation. Microscopes allow scientists to observe tiny organisms and cells that are otherwise invisible, providing crucial data and insights.
Controlling Variables in Experiments
When a student conducts an investigation on the effect of temperature on the metabolism of yeast, it is important to maintain certain constant variables. The correct choice is:
- B. Mass of yeast and mass of sugar. Keeping the mass of yeast and the amount of sugar constant ensures that any changes in gas production can be attributed solely to changes in temperature.
Scientific Law vs. Scientific Theory
Scientific laws and theories share similarities in that both:
- B. describe the events that can be observed in nature. While laws state what happens, theories explain why and how these events occur based on evidence.
Learn more about scientific methodologies and principles here:
https://brainly.com/question/14368636