Answer :
Final answer:
Ampliativity indeed often comes at the expense of certainty. As we amplify or extend claims beyond the immediate evidence, we may introduce degrees of uncertainty. However, it's sometimes the best approach we can take when dealing with complex, uncertain circumstances.
Explanation:
True, ampliativity often does come at the expense of certainty. Ampliativity is a concept that involves making broader claims based on specific evidence or knowledge; it's essentially a form of generalization. In other words, the more you opt to extend or amplify a particular belief or claim beyond the immediate evidence, the more likely you are to encounter uncertainty.
For example, a scientist conducting an experiment might find a specific result under controlled conditions. If they then generalize this result to apply to broader real-world situations, they are engaging in ampliativity. But the more they extend their claim, the greater the likelihood that other factors not present in the controlled experiment might introduce degrees of uncertainty into the result.
This doesn’t make ampliativity a wrong approach. As conveyed in the moral life example, sometimes it’s the best we can do when grappling with the uncertainty of real-world situations. The key is to balance the need for ampliativity to make meaningful interpretations with the awareness that doing so often involves a calculated risk regarding certainty.
Learn more about Ampliativity here:
https://brainly.com/question/21698818
#SPJ11
