Your royal builders have informed you of two types of rock that can be used to rebuild the castle walls: granite or limestone. Granite is stronger but more expensive. Limestone is weaker but more affordable. Because it is lighter and weaker, limestone will need to be replaced sooner than granite. You have also learned that more people prefer the look of granite over limestone. There are more granite quarries than limestone quarries in England. Limestone also breaks easily during shipping. No matter what your decision is, you will have to raise taxes to pay for the rebuilding.

What are the costs of using limestone instead of granite? Check all that apply.

1) Limestone is weaker than granite.
2) Limestone is cheaper than granite.
3) Limestone lasts longer than granite.
4) Limestone is harder to find than granite.
5) Limestone does not last as long as granite.

Using limestone costs include its weaker nature, shorter lifespan, and shipping damages, despite it being more affordable than granite. Hence, the correct answer is option (1), (2), (5).

Explanation:

The costs of using limestone instead of granite for rebuilding the castle walls include its weaker structure, the likelihood of needing to replace it sooner due to its lesser durability, and its vulnerability to damage during shipping. Although limestone is more affordable than granite, the potential higher frequency of repairs or replacement increases the long-term costs.

Moreover, popular preference leans towards the aesthetic and stronger qualities of granite, which in turn could impact the long-term valuation and image of the castle. The readily available granite quarries in England makes it a more accessible material despite its initial higher costs.

Learn more about Building Materials here:

https://brainly.com/question/29471087

#SPJ11