Answer :
Answer:no
Explanation:
I would smoke weed because it’s better
Final answer:
The debate on whether marijuana should be legal spans public opinion, state and federal law, and the criminal justice system. Discrepancies in state laws versus federal law lead to legal complexities and disparities in enforcement. Standardization of marijuana laws could reduce these disparities and contribute to a more equitable legal system.
Explanation:
The question of whether marijuana should be legal is one that involves various issues including public health, criminal justice, and state versus federal legislative power. Historical perspectives on this matter indicate that public opinion has shifted significantly over the decades from a strong opposition to now a majority in favor of legalizing marijuana.
Differences in marijuana laws across states, and between state and federal levels, can create a complex legal environment for users. For instance, a person who legally purchases marijuana in one state could face serious legal consequences if they cross into a neighboring state where it is illegal. The federal government still classifies marijuana as a Schedule 1 substance, leading to potential conflicts where state laws have permitted its use.
The disparities in law enforcement and the application of marijuana laws have prompted debates over the necessity of a unified approach. Overcrowded prisons and racial disparities in marijuana-related arrests add to the urgency of this discourse. The cases such as Gonzales v. Raich demonstrate the ongoing legal tensions between different levels of government.
To rectify these disparities, some propose that the federal government should acknowledge the changing perspective on marijuana, possibly by reclassifying it under federal law and thereby alleviating the conflicts with state laws. This could help in standardizing legal treatment and enforcement across the country, leading to a more equitable system.
