Which of the following statements best describes the reason why social networking companies cannot be sued for defamation for user postings that appear on their sites?

A. The Communications Decency Act (CDA) uses a vague definition of indecency.
B. The Communications Decency Act (CDA) is not applicable to social networking sites.
C. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) is not considered unconstitutional.
D. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) does not provide immunity to an Internet service provider (ISP).

Social networking companies cannot be sued for defamation for user postings because they are protected under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA).

Explanation:

The correct answer is c. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) is not considered unconstitutional.

Section 230 of the CDA provides immunity to social networking companies and other Internet service providers from liability for user-generated content that appears on their platforms. This means that the companies cannot be sued for defamation for user postings because they are protected under this law.

The purpose of Section 230 is to encourage the growth of the internet and promote free speech while also allowing companies to moderate and filter content without fear of being held legally responsible for everything that is posted by users.

Learn more about Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) here:

https://brainly.com/question/30431745

#SPJ11