Answer :
Final answer:
Among the given options, 'agreements to submit a bid on a construction project' does not represent an agreement injuring public service. The rest involve illegal activities that harm the public good. The integrity of public service should be maintained by ensuring abuses of power for personal gain and illicit agreements are avoided.
Explanation:
In the context of agreements injuring public service, the correct answer is '3) agreements to submit a bid on a construction project'. The other three options include illicit activities like agreements to sell public offices, agreements to obtain pardons through offers of money, and agreements by public officers to accept less in pay than stipulated by law, which are all examples of agreements causing harm to public service. Bidding on a construction project, on the other hand, is a normal part of business and does not harm public service as long as it's done legally and ethically.
Harming public service essentially means activities or agreements that hinder or obstruct the functioning or the sanctity of public offices and services, affecting the welfare of the public. An example of this would be the abuse of public position by public officers and employees to obtain personal benefits. This is why agreements like selling public offices or obtaining pardons with money are considered as harming public service.
It's essential for these public services and goods, akin to fire and police services, to be provided equitably and transparently to all citizens. Agreements or activities that undermine these principles are harmful to public service and represent a breach of trust of the public towards government officials.
Learn more about Agreements injuring public service here:
https://brainly.com/question/28524839
#SPJ11
