Answer :
The answer to the question is letter B. When a Supreme Court justice disagrees with the decision of the majority of the members, he or she may write a dissenting opinion. Dissenting opinions are opinions about a legal case written by a justice that does not agree with the majority of the court.
Final answer:
A Supreme Court justice who disagrees with the majority's decision expresses their opposing view by writing a dissenting opinion, while a concurring opinion is written by a justice who agrees with the decision but has a different reasoning.
Explanation:
When a Supreme Court justice disagrees with the decision of the majority of the members, he or she may write a dissenting opinion. This is the written stance of a justice (or justices) who disagree with the majority’s conclusion, offering an alternative interpretation of the laws or Constitution.
On the other hand, if a justice agrees with the majority's ruling but not their reasoning, or wishes to highlight an alternative aspect of the case, they may write a concurring opinion. It's important to note that only one of these options correctly fits the context of a justice disagreeing with the majority, which is the dissenting opinion.
