Answer :
The objective theory of contracts is a legal principle that emphasizes the manifestation of intent between parties to be bound by an agreement. It holds that in determining the existence and scope of a contract, courts should focus on the objective manifestations of intent rather than the subjective beliefs or intentions of the parties.
Leonard v. PepsiCo Inc. 210 F. 3d 88 (2d cir 2000) is a case that dealt with the objective theory of contracts. In this case, PepsiCo created a commercial featuring a fictional fighter jet exchange program that could be obtained by collecting Pepsi points. John Leonard, a customer, collected the required Pepsi points and attempted to purchase the jet. PepsiCo refused stating that the commercial was meant to be humorous and not to be taken seriously.
The court applied the objective theory of contracts and held that the commercial could not be reasonably interpreted as a serious offer, and therefore, Leonard did not have a valid contract with PepsiCo. This case highlights the importance of objective manifestations of intent in contract law.
Learn more about objective theory here:
https://brainly.com/question/32282775
#SPJ4
Final answer:
The objective theory of contracts is a principle in contract law that focuses on the external, objective manifestations of the parties to a contract. In Leonard v. PepsiCo Inc. 210 F. 3d 88 (2d cir 2000), the objective theory of contracts was applied to determine if a TV commercial constituted a valid offer.
Explanation:
The objective theory of contracts is a principle in contract law that focuses on the external, objective manifestations of the parties to a contract, rather than their subjective intent. It looks at how a reasonable person would interpret the words and actions of the parties to determine the true meaning of the contract.
In Leonard v. PepsiCo Inc. 210 F. 3d 88 (2d cir 2000), the objective theory of contracts was applied to determine if a humorous TV commercial constituted a valid offer. The court held that the commercial did not amount to an enforceable contract because the objective theory required a reasonable person to believe that the offer was serious and intended to create legal relations.
