Answer :
The "Double Deficit" hypothesis describes deficiencies in phonological awareness and rapid automized naming as predictors of dysfluent reading, both crucial for successful reading and potential targets for interventions to assist children with dyslexia.
The correct answer is a. Phonological awareness, rapid automized naming
The "Double Deficit" hypothesis proposed by Wolff and Bowers in 1999 refers to deficiencies in two key areas that predict dysfluent reading. These areas are phonological awareness and rapid automized naming (RAN). Phonological awareness involves the ability to recognize and manipulate sounds in spoken language, which is critical for reading success. Rapid automized naming pertains to the speed at which one can name familiar objects, colors, digits, or letters, which affects the ability to read fluently.
Considering the importance of these skills, interventions aimed at improving phonological awareness and RAN could potentially assist children in overcoming difficulties associated with dyslexia. The research suggests that children with dyslexia can have particular challenges related to phonological processing and working memory, which impacts their language development and reading abilities.
The correct answer is a. Phonological awareness, rapid automized naming
Final answer:
The 'Double Deficit' hypothesis predicts dysfluent reading based on deficiencies in phonological awareness and rapid automized naming. These deficits impact reading fluency and comprehension and can be mitigated by enhancing oral language skills and targeting phonological processing and naming speed in interventions.
Explanation:
The \
Learn more about Double Deficit Hypothesis here:
https://brainly.com/question/31602253
#SPJ11
