Answer :
Final answer:
Mapp v. Ohio established that evidence obtained through illegal searches is inadmissible in state courts, thus extending the federal exclusionary rule to states. This case was crucial in protecting individual rights against unlawful government actions. It marked a significant expansion of the Fourth Amendment's protections.
Explanation:
Mapp v. Ohio: Overview
The case of Mapp v. Ohio, decided in 1961, was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court. It primarily addressed the issue of illegal searches and seizures conducted by state authorities.
Key Outcomes
In this case, the Court held that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible in state courts, thereby imposing the federal exclusionary rule onto state courts. This was significant as it extended the protections of the Fourth Amendment—which previously applied only to federal prosecutions—to state prosecutions, ensuring that all levels of government are held to the same standard regarding evidence collection.
Importance of the Decision
This ruling reinforced individual rights and protection against governmental overreach, solidifying the principle that individuals have the right to privacy. The decision emphasized that illegally obtained evidence cannot be used to convict someone in court, which has become a cornerstone of American law.
Learn more about exclusionary rule here:
https://brainly.com/question/12239906
