Prudence, the head of human resources at Acme AutoZone, was becoming concerned about Desmond's work ethic. Desmond had been with the company for nearly five years and had always met expectations in his job. However, following a car accident several months ago, Desmond's behavior had changed. Upon his return to work, Desmond began to take long breaks and extended lunches. When he returned, there was often a peculiar odor on his clothes. Desmond's co-workers were complaining that he was no longer doing his share of the work and that they had to cover for him.

Desmond's manager, Rajiv, recognized the mysterious odor as marijuana and tried to speak with him about it. Desmond told him to "get lost" and muttered some profanities as he left his manager's office. As a result of his manager's report on Desmond's use of marijuana during work hours and his attempted conversation with the employee, Prudence decided it was time to terminate Desmond's employment. Prudence called Desmond into her office and gave him the news that he was terminated immediately and that there would be no termination pay.

Desmond became very upset. He claimed that he was being unjustly treated due to his medical condition. Desmond said that his doctor had prescribed the use of medical marijuana to deal with pain that he was experiencing following his accident. He asked, "How can I be fired for following doctor's orders?"

Questions:

1. What are the issues raised by Desmond's termination? What should Desmond do in the circumstances?
2. Did Prudence follow the proper process in this case? Why or why not?
3. What if Desmond was not, in fact, using marijuana under a doctor's prescription? Would this change things?

1. The issues raised by Desmond's termination are related to his use of medical marijuana and whether it was being used in accordance with a doctor's prescription.

Desmond claims that he was using medical marijuana to manage pain following his car accident, and he believes he was unjustly terminated for following his doctor's orders. This raises questions about whether the company's policies and actions were in compliance with laws regarding medical marijuana use.

In these circumstances, Desmond should consider taking the following steps:
a) Gather evidence: Desmond should gather all relevant medical documentation and prescriptions that support his claim of using medical marijuana for his condition.
b) Consult legal advice: Desmond should seek legal advice to understand his rights and options in this situation, as employment laws and regulations can vary depending on the jurisdiction.
c) Review company policies: Desmond should review the company's policies regarding drug use, workplace conduct, and accommodation for medical conditions. This will help him understand if the company followed proper procedures in his termination.

2. Prudence did not follow the proper process in this case. Before terminating an employee, it is generally expected that an employer would engage in a process that involves investigation, discussion, and documentation. In this case, Prudence terminated Desmond without giving him an opportunity to explain his situation, present evidence, or engage in any form of due process. Prudence also did not provide any termination pay, which may not align with legal requirements or the company's own policies.

3. If Desmond was not using marijuana under a doctor's prescription, it would change the circumstances. In this case, his claim of using medical marijuana to manage pain would be invalid, and the company's decision to terminate him based on marijuana use during work hours would be justified. Without a valid medical reason, Desmond's use of marijuana during work hours could be seen as a violation of company policies and workplace standards. However, it would still be important for the company to follow proper termination procedures and adhere to any legal requirements in the process.

To learn more about Desmond's termination
https://brainly.com/question/32959763
#SPJ11