Answer :
To estimate [tex]\(193 \div 4\)[/tex], we need to choose the expression with numbers closer to 193 that still allow easy computation. We have two options:
1. [tex]\(200 \div 4\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\(160 \div 4\)[/tex]
Let's determine which is a better estimate:
- Step 1: Compare 193 to 200 and 160.
- 193 is closer to 200 than to 160. This makes [tex]\(200 \div 4\)[/tex] a better choice for the estimate.
- Step 2: Calculate using the chosen compatible numbers.
- [tex]\(200 \div 4 = 50\)[/tex]
So, using the chosen expression [tex]\(200 \div 4\)[/tex], we estimate that [tex]\(193 \div 4\)[/tex] is about 50.
In conclusion, the expression with better compatible numbers is [tex]\(200 \div 4\)[/tex], and the estimated quotient for [tex]\(193 \div 4\)[/tex] is approximately 50.
1. [tex]\(200 \div 4\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\(160 \div 4\)[/tex]
Let's determine which is a better estimate:
- Step 1: Compare 193 to 200 and 160.
- 193 is closer to 200 than to 160. This makes [tex]\(200 \div 4\)[/tex] a better choice for the estimate.
- Step 2: Calculate using the chosen compatible numbers.
- [tex]\(200 \div 4 = 50\)[/tex]
So, using the chosen expression [tex]\(200 \div 4\)[/tex], we estimate that [tex]\(193 \div 4\)[/tex] is about 50.
In conclusion, the expression with better compatible numbers is [tex]\(200 \div 4\)[/tex], and the estimated quotient for [tex]\(193 \div 4\)[/tex] is approximately 50.