No-CFC and Green Cool manufacture air conditioners. No-CFC claims that their air conditioners cool faster than Green Cool air conditioners. An air conditioning magazine decided to test No-CFC's claim. They randomly tested five No-CFC air conditioners at their Dallas office and five Green Cool air conditioners at their Phoenix office. All of the air conditioners had the same specifications, were set to auto cooling mode, and were installed in rooms with the same amount of space to be cooled.

After observing the cooling effect of each air conditioner, the magazine reported that the average time it takes for a No-CFC air conditioner to reduce the room temperature by 3°F was 10 minutes, and the average time it takes for a Green Cool air conditioner to reduce the room temperature by 3°F was 12 minutes.

Given the magazine’s data collection method and report, what conclusion can be made?

The No-CFC air conditioners do really cool a room by 3°F more quickly than Green Cool air conditioners, according to the statistics provided by the magazine.

It's crucial to note that the locations where the air conditioners were tested might have had an impact on these findings. The climates in Dallas and Phoenix are different, which can have an impact on the effectiveness and performance of the air conditioner.

The Energy Efficiency Rating (EER), which assesses an air conditioner's operating cost, should also be taken into account in addition to cooling speed. One air conditioner may be able to chill a room more quickly, but that does not necessarily mean it is the most economical option in terms of energy use and overall cost.

Learn more about Air Conditioner Efficiency here:

brainly.com/question/31837015

#SPJ4