Answer :
Final answer:
Judges who do not agree with the majority opinion usually write the dissenting opinion. This is the case when the decision of a court is not unanimous, and one or more judges have different interpretations or concerns regarding the case. They use the dissenting opinion to express their disagreement with the majority.
Explanation:
When judges are not in agreement with the prevailing decision of a court case, they often express their divergent views and legal reasoning in a dissenting opinion. This is a crucial aspect of the judicial system as it not only shows the multiplicity of legal interpretations that can arise from a given set of facts or laws, but it also serves as a record for future cases which might find the dissent's reasoning more pertinent or powerful due to changes in societal values, new evidence, or shifts in legal paradigms. Furthermore, a dissenting opinion can influence lawmakers, may become the basis for a future majority opinion, and can serve as a critique of the majority's decision-making process.
