Answer :
To determine whether the advertisement's claim about the average braking distance is false, we start by defining the null and alternative hypotheses.
Step 1: State the Hypotheses
Null Hypothesis [tex](H_0)[/tex]: The average braking distance [tex](\mu)[/tex] is equal to 120 feet. [tex]H_0: \mu = 120[/tex]
Alternative Hypothesis [tex](H_a)[/tex]: The average braking distance [tex](\mu)[/tex] is different from 120 feet. [tex]H_a: \mu \neq 120[/tex]
This is a two-tailed test because we are checking if the braking distance is different (it could be either more or less).
Step 2: Identify Key Information
Sample size [tex](n)[/tex]: 36
Sample mean [tex](\bar{x})[/tex]: 126 feet
Population standard deviation [tex](\sigma)[/tex]: 22 feet
Significance level [tex](\alpha)[/tex]: 0.05
Step 3: Calculate the Test Statistic
The formula for the test statistic [tex]z[/tex] is:
[tex]z = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu_0}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]
Where:
- [tex]\bar{x}[/tex] = Sample mean = 126
- [tex]\mu_0[/tex] = Hypothesized population mean = 120
- [tex]\sigma[/tex] = Population standard deviation = 22
- [tex]n[/tex] = Sample size = 36
Substitute the values into the formula:
[tex]z = \frac{126 - 120}{\frac{22}{\sqrt{36}}}[/tex]
[tex]z = \frac{6}{\frac{22}{6}}[/tex]
[tex]z = \frac{6}{3.6667}[/tex]
[tex]z \approx 1.64[/tex]
Step 4: Determine the Critical Value(s)
For a two-tailed test at a significance level of 0.05, the critical z-values are approximately [tex]-1.96[/tex] and [tex]1.96[/tex]. This means we will reject the null hypothesis if the calculated test statistic is less than [tex]-1.96[/tex] or greater than [tex]1.96[/tex].
Step 5: Make the Decision
Since the calculated test statistic [tex]z \approx 1.64[/tex] is not greater than [tex]1.96[/tex] or less than [tex]-1.96[/tex], we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
This means there is not enough statistical evidence to say that the true average braking distance is different from 120 feet at the 5% significance level.
Thus, the correct answer is +1.64.