Answer :
Final answer:
Food challenges should not be banned because they serve as an aspirational goal and promote a sense of achievement, and banning them undermines personal responsibility and individual liberty. Instead, educating the public on risks and responsible behavior is preferable.
Explanation:
Food challenges should not be banned for a couple of reasons. First, they can be an aspirational activity that encourages individuals to strive for a goal. While it's important to promote a healthy lifestyle, setting goals that are too restrictive can be seen as impossible and demotivating. In the context of food challenges, they provide a sense of achievement when completed, and banning them could remove this source of motivation for self-improvement.
Secondly, personal responsibility and individual liberty play key roles in why food challenges should not be banned. Just as activities like downhill skiing and skydiving, which carry some risk, are not prohibited, individuals should be free to partake in food challenges. The emphasis should be on educating the public about the risks and encouraging responsible behavior, rather than outright bans which impinge on personal freedom.
Answer: Food Challenges should NOT be banned.
Explanation: Because food is important, and the challenges make it even more important, basically food challenges are needed for the children, and their poor lifes.
