Answer :
2.1 Refer to paragraph 1.
(a) Mrs. Maloney is suffering from shock as implied by the description that everything she does feels automatic, and she experiences slight nausea with a desire to vomit. These points suggest that she is emotionally overwhelmed and not entirely aware of her actions.
(b) An indication that she does not plan to kill her husband is her initial action of preparing dinner. She takes the leg of lamb to make supper, implying her expectations of a normal evening, not a violent encounter.
2.2 Refer to paragraph 3.
This is a crime of passion. The spontaneous action of swinging the frozen leg of lamb at her husband without forethought shows that it wasn't premeditated. Mary's actions seem fueled by immediate emotion rather than pre-planned intent.
2.3 Refer to lines 25-26.
(a) She has to think fast because she has just committed a serious crime and needs to figure out how to avoid immediate consequences, such as being arrested.
(b) The penalty would be severe punishment for committing murder, likely a prison sentence.
(c) The penalty might be a relief for her because it signifies an end to her shock and confusion, replacing it with a straightforward course of action from others (justice system handling the issue).
2.4 Immediately after the events in this extract, Mrs. Maloney becomes concerned about covering up her crime and ensuring that she does not get caught.
2.5 Patrick Maloney is a cold-hearted character because he dismisses his wife's efforts and boldly states his intention without considering her feelings. His indifferent attitude suggests emotional detachment.
2.6 Mary Maloney creates an alibi by going out to the grocery store after murdering her husband. She acts calmly and engages in conversations with shopkeepers to portray normalcy, establishing a timeline that could suggest she was not at home during the murder.
2.7 The irony in how Mary Maloney gets rid of the murder weapon is that she later cooks the leg of lamb and serves it to the detectives who are investigating her husband's death. This is ironic because they unknowingly consume the very evidence that could implicate her in the crime.