Answer :

are diamonds mined in a war zone and sold to finance an insurgency, an invading army's war efforts, or a warlord's activity. The term is used to highlight the negative consequences of the diamond trade in certain areas, or to label an individual diamond as having come from such an area

Final answer:

Blood diamonds in Africa are those mined in war zones and sold to finance armed conflict against governments. The revenue from blood diamonds has funded civil wars and militia, contributing to the destabilization and suffering in countries like Angola. The issue is tied to the legacy of colonialism and the current dominance of multinational companies in the diamond industry.

Explanation:

The issue with 'blood diamonds' is deeply rooted in the history of certain African countries, where these precious stones have been mined and sold to finance conflicts, warlords, and military groups. In Angola, resistant groups mined diamonds to sell on the international market as a means to fund their military activities. Revenue from such sales was used to support the long and devastating civil war that wreaked havoc on the nation's people and infrastructure.

Despite the ongoing mining and income generated from diamonds, there is still a struggle to control the diamond industry effectively to prevent the flow of 'blood diamonds.' As DeBeers controls a significant portion of the global diamond market, there is also a focus on how multinationals influence these markets. The painful history of European colonialism, with its own cycle of exploitation and brutality, has also left a lasting impact on the continent, shaping current economic challenges and conflicts.

The 'resource curse' further exacerbates economic and social issues in Sub-Saharan Africa, where the abundance of natural resources like diamonds often leads to violence, human rights abuses, and struggles over the control of these resources, rather than benefiting local populations and leading to development.