Answer :
Texas v. Johnson (1989) Justice William J. Opinion Brennan Jr.: ruled in favor of Johnson, stating flag burning is protected by the First Amendment. "Protecting free speech, even when offensive, is emphasized in the majority opinion." Brennan argued flag burning is symbolic speech and should be protected.
What is the opinion?
Government flag preservation does not outweigh individual political expression. Justice William H. dissenting. Rehnquist dissented, flag burning not protected under First Amendment. He stressed the American flag's symbolic significance as an embodiment of the nation's ideals and history.
I agree with the majority opinion despite the dissent. J. Brennan affirms freedom of speech as vital to democracy. Value protecting political expression, even when controversial. Flag burning is powerful symbolic speech that allows people to protest government policies. Recognizing protected dissent under First Amendment allows vibrant marketplace of ideas.
Learn more about Texas and Johnson from
https://brainly.com/question/32121333
#SPJ1
Consider the majority opinion and the dissenting opinion on this seminal U.S. court case. Using evidence from both opinions as an aid to support your ideas, write your own response to the case. Texas and Johnson
