Amber Mining and Milling, Incorporated, contracted with Truax Corporation to have a custom-made lathe constructed. The machine was completed and ready for use on January 1, 2024. Amber paid for the lathe by issuing an $850,000, three-year note that specified 4% interest, payable annually on December 31 of each year. The cash market price of the lathe was unknown. It was determined by comparison with similar transactions that 9% was a reasonable rate of interest.

The question revolves around a business transaction between Amber Mining and Milling, Incorporated and Truax Corporation involving issuance of a note as payment. An interest differential was identified indicating a possible overpayment by Amber due to the lower interest rate on the note compared to the market rate.

Explanation:

This question involves a business transaction between Amber Mining and Milling, Incorporated and Truax Corporation, where the latter constructed a custom-made lathe for Amber and was paid with a $850,000, three-year note featuring 4% annual interest, payed each December 31st. However, the cash market price of the lathe was unknown and a 9% interest rate was estimated to be reasonable based on similar transactions.

From this information, it can be inferred that Amber might have overpaid considering that the agreed upon interest rate was less than the market interest rate. As a rule in finance, if the interest rate on a note is less than the market interest rate, the note has been issued at a premium. In this case, the premium is the difference between the market interest rate and the interest rate of the note.

Learn more about Note Issuance here:

https://brainly.com/question/34214235

#SPJ11