Answer :
Final answer:
A justice who votes with the majority but for different legal reasons will likely write a concurring opinion. This type of opinion allows justices to express their unique reasoning while still aligning with the majority's decision. It plays a significant role in the legal discourse of the court's decisions.
Explanation:
Understanding Supreme Court Opinions
When a Supreme Court justice votes with the majority but has different legal reasons than the other justices, that justice is likely to write a concurring opinion. A concurring opinion is an opinion written by a justice who agrees with the Court's majority opinion but offers different legal reasoning for their agreement. This allows the justice to express their unique perspective on the case while still supporting the overall decision.
In contrast, a dissenting opinion is written by justices who disagree with the majority decision. Majority opinions are the official rulings that provide the legal basis for the Court's decisions. This distinction is crucial for understanding how justices articulate their views in the realm of law.
Learn more about Supreme Court Opinions here:
https://brainly.com/question/16641975
