Answer :
Critics of trying juveniles as adults emphasize the harm it can cause, suggesting the juvenile justice system, focused on rehabilitation, is more suitable for those under 18. Developmental science supports this view, showing youths' brains are still maturing.
There is a significant debate about whether juveniles should be tried as adults. Critics argue that placing juveniles in the adult criminal justice system can do more harm than good.
The concerns focus on the potential for juveniles to be negatively influenced by adult offenders, the lack of appropriate rehabilitation in adult facilities, and the mismatches in developmental maturity between juveniles and adults.
This perspective considers the juvenile justice system more suitable for those under 18, as it is structured around rehabilitation and correcting behavior rather than just punishment.
Some states do try juveniles as adults, especially when the crimes are severe. However, there are increasing calls to reconsider such policies due to the significant implications it has on a young person's future.
Compelling arguments against trying juveniles as adults include developmental science showing that the brains of youths are still developing, which impacts their decision-making and impulse control.
Additionally, the presence of the infancy defense in many jurisdictions points to a societal understanding that youthful offenders are likely incapable of forming the same criminal intent as adults.
