Answer :
Final answer:
The chief justice typically writes the majority opinion if they are part of the majority, reflecting the views of the justices in the majority. Justices are not required to write the opinion, nor is a majority opinion contingent on universal agreement. Dissenting justices do not have to agree with the majority opinion at any point.
Explanation:
Understanding Majority Opinion Characteristics
A majority opinion is a crucial aspect of the decision-making process within the judiciary, particularly in the Supreme Court of the United States. One key characteristic of a majority opinion is that the chief justice usually writes the majority opinion if they are a part of the majority. This occurs unless they delegate this task to another justice in the majority. Here are some details explaining this characteristic:
- The chief justice has the authority to influence how the opinion is framed and presented.
- The majority opinion reflects the views of more than half of the justices, and it sets a legal precedent that will guide future cases.
- Notably, justices who are part of the majority are not required to write the opinion; it’s typically one designated justice who writes it, which could be the chief justice if they are in the majority.
In contrast, the other options provided are inaccurate for the following reasons:
- Not all justices in the majority are required to write an opinion; only one usually does.
- A majority opinion does not necessitate universal agreement among all justices.
- Justices who disagree offer dissenting opinions and do not need to eventually agree with the majority opinion.
Therefore, the best choice regarding the characteristic of a majority opinion is that the chief justice typically writes it when part of the majority.
Learn more about Majority Opinion Characteristics here:
https://brainly.com/question/30514631
