Which of the following best explains why ampliative reasoning is another way to describe induction?

A. Because ampliative reasoning involves an amplification of the premises. This amplification involves the addition of a likelihood or chance.
B. Because ampliative reasoning involves an amplification of soundness. This is because the given inductive argument is valid and strong.
C. Because ampliative reasoning involves an amplification of validity. This means that the conclusion necessarily follows and thus amplifies the premises.
D. Because ampliative reasoning involves truth-preservation. This means that the conclusion necessarily follows and thus amplifies the premises.

Ampliative reasoning is another way to describe induction because it involves an amplification of the premises by adding likelihood or chance, making the conclusion probably but not certainly true.

Explanation:

The correct answer to why ampliative reasoning is another way to describe induction is A - Because ampliative reasoning involves an amplification involves an amplification of the premises. This amplification involves the addition of a likelihood or of chance. Inductive reasoning does not guarantee the truth of its conclusions but suggests that the conclusion is probably true if the premises are true.

Ampliative reasoning looks beyond what is already contained in the premises and works by projection, enlargement, or extension. In induction, we arrive at a general conclusion based on a set of specific observations or facts, which is inherently an ampliative process because the conclusion contains more information than the sum of the premises. Therefore, the term ampliative is apt for inductive reasoning as it reflects the idea that conclusions go beyond the premises provided.

Learn more about Ampliative Reasoning here:

https://brainly.com/question/21698818

#SPJ11