Answer :
The Communications Decency Act was criticized for being too ambiguous and wide and for not using the least restrictive methods to achieve its objective of safeguarding minors, which were two of the key reasons against it that the Court acknowledged. Here, choice B is the right response.
The Communications Decency Act of 1995 amends the Communications Act of 1934 to forbid the use of any telecommunications equipment by a person who does not reveal his or her identity to irritate, abuse, threaten, or harass a recipient of such communication.
Internet users as a whole were firmly against the Communications Decency Act, and with the EFF's assistance, the Supreme Court overturned its anti-free expression provisions. Fortunately, CDA 230 is still in effect and has significantly outperformed other laws throughout the years.
Complete question:
Which one of the following are the two main arguments against the Communications Decency Act accepted by the courts?
A - it was not enforceable, and it did not use the least restrictive means of accomplishing the goal of protecting children
B - it was too vague and broad, and it did not use the least restrictive means of accomplishing the goal of protecting children
C - it was too vague and broad, and it did not use community standards to determine what would be harmful to minors
D - it was not enforceable, and it did not use community standards to determine what would be harmful to minors
To learn more about the Communications Decency Act
https://brainly.com/question/28484029
#SPJ4
