Answer :
Final answer:
Choosing between a framework of multiple intelligences or a single intelligence factor for assessment depends on the assessment context. Multiple intelligences theory is more inclusive of various intellectual abilities, while a one-factor intelligence model focuses on a single underlying factor that traditional IQ tests measure. The choice should align with the assessment's goals.
Explanation:
When assessing someone's intelligence, the choice to use a framework of multiple intelligences or a one-factor intelligence approach depends on the context and purpose of the assessment. For broad educational purposes, Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences can be more inclusive and acknowledges a variety of intellectual strengths that may not be captured in traditional IQ tests. This theory includes different domains such as linguistic intelligence, logical-mathematical intelligence, and others, broadening the scope of what is recognized as 'intelligent'. On the other hand, the one-factor model of intelligence, or 'g' proposed by Charles Spearman, suggests that there is a single underlying intelligence factor that standard IQ tests can measure.
Raymond Cattell's proposal of crystallized and fluid intelligence also adds complexity to the idea of a single intelligence by distinguishing between the ability to utilize learned knowledge and problem-solving skills. Furthermore, emotional intelligence, introduced by researchers like Daniel Goleman, points to the importance of social and emotional abilities in success, challenging traditional metrics once more. These theories and discussions suggest that intelligence is multifaceted and influenced by various factors. Therefore, the choice of framework for intelligence assessment should be considering the goals and the context in which it is being applied.
Learn more about Intelligence Assessment Frameworks here:
https://brainly.com/question/33096634
#SPJ11
