Answer :
Final Answer:
When an appellate judge disagrees with the result and with the reasoning of the majority opinion, but disagrees with the reasoning of the dissenting opinion as well she may write a partially dissenting opinion.
Option C is correct.
Explanation:
When an appellate judge finds fault with both the majority opinion and the dissenting opinion but still disagrees with the final outcome, she may choose to write a partially dissenting opinion. This type of opinion allows the judge to express her disagreement with certain aspects of both the majority and dissenting opinions while explaining her unique perspective on the case. It provides a nuanced view that highlights specific points of contention without fully aligning with either side.
In a partially dissenting opinion, the judge can articulate her reasons for not fully endorsing the majority decision while also addressing the flaws in the dissenting opinion. This approach allows for a more comprehensive and balanced assessment of the case, helping to clarify the judge's position and contributing to the development of legal principles.
A partially dissenting opinion often adds depth to the appellate court's understanding of the issues at hand and can influence future decisions in similar cases. It is a valuable tool for judges to express their legal reasoning and contribute to the ongoing evolution of the law.
Option C is correct.
Learn more about dissenting opinion
brainly.com/question/32039533
#SPJ11
