Answer :
Final answer:
When a judge disagrees with both the reasoning and result of the majority opinion, but also disagrees with the dissenting opinion, they may choose to write a per curiam opinion. So the correct option is b) a per curiam opinion
Explanation:
A per curiam opinion is typically a brief, unanimous decision issued by an appellate court that does not identify the individual judge or judges responsible for the opinion. It is often used when the court wants to convey a single, clear message without attributing it to a specific judge.
In such cases, a judge may believe that neither the majority opinion nor the dissenting opinion adequately represents their views, and they opt for a per curiam opinion to express a different perspective. This type of opinion allows the judge to articulate their dissent from both sides while maintaining a degree of anonymity.
Per curiam opinions are commonly used in appellate courts, especially in cases where the court wants to present a unified front or where individual judges may have varying reasons for their decision. These opinions can be important for understanding the nuances of judicial disagreement within a panel or court. So the correct option is b) a per curiam opinion
Learn more about dissenting opinion,
brainly.com/question/32473688
#SPJ11
