Answer :
Final answer:
The argument concludes wrestling is a sport based on its similarity to boxing. A negative source analogue could be karate, as it presents a form of combat but diverges from the sport context. Other options either relate to combat or do not contradict the argument as clearly as karate does.
Explanation:
Understanding the Argument
The argument presented states that boxing is similar to wrestling because both are forms of combat, and concludes that since boxing is a sport, wrestling must also be a sport. To find a negative source analogue, we look for an example that contradicts the strength of the argument through a lack of shared qualities.
Identifying Negative Source Analogue
An example of a negative source analogue would be karate. While karate is also a form of combat, it's not a direct sport comparison to wrestling, just as it lacks the same regulated competitive structure as boxing and wrestling do; thus, demonstrating a deviation in similarity.
In contrast, options such as war, sumo wrestling, and fist do not clearly illustrate a direct contradiction to the argument yet show some level of combat relation. On the other hand, reading is a complete deviation from combat sports altogether.
Learn more about negative source analogue here:
https://brainly.com/question/22058326
