Answer :
Final answer:
The level of proof required to stop a person is known as reasonable suspicion, which requires specific facts that suggest criminal activity. This is different from probable cause, which is necessary for an arrest. The standard of beyond a reasonable doubt applies only during a trial to secure a conviction.
Explanation:
Level of Proof Required to Stop a Person
In the criminal investigative process, the level of proof required to stop a person is based on the concept of reasonable suspicion.
Reasonable suspicion occurs when a law enforcement officer has specific and articulable facts that lead them to believe that a person may be involved in criminal activity. This is less than the level of proof required for an arrest or search, which is called probable cause.
- Option A is correct: reasonable suspicion is what officers need to temporarily detain a person for further investigation.
- Once officers have developed enough information to believe that an arrest is warranted, they would need probable cause.
- Beyond a reasonable doubt is the highest standard of proof, used in criminal trials to determine guilt.
In summary, to stop a person, officers need reasonable suspicion, which is a lower threshold than probable cause.
Learn more about reasonable suspicion here:
https://brainly.com/question/29617866
