Dear beloved readers, welcome to our website! We hope your visit here brings you valuable insights and meaningful inspiration. Thank you for taking the time to stop by and explore the content we've prepared for you.
------------------------------------------------ What is the consensus guideline?

A. A journalist should act to save a life or prevent injury if he or she is the best person or the only person in a position to intervene.

B. A journalist should never act to save a life or prevent injury because to intervene is a violation of journalistic ethics.

C. A journalist should act to save a life or prevent injury if the intervention will get the reporter a scoop.

D. A journalist should never act to save a life or prevent an injury unless their editor gives permission.

The consensus guideline suggests that a journalist should intervene in life-saving situations if they are best positioned to do so, aligning with ethical standards emphasizing public service and minimizing harm.

Explanation:

The question revolves around the consensus guideline for journalists regarding their intervention in situations where they could save a life or prevent injury. According to the Code of Ethics established by the Society of Professional Journalists, the primary obligation of ethical journalism is to serve the public, which encompasses acting to save a life or prevent injury when necessary.

This guideline underscores the importance of human dignity and the respect that journalists must maintain towards their subjects, sources, colleagues, and members of the public. Therefore, the correct answer is: a journalist should act to save a life or prevent injury if he or she is the best person or the only person in a position to intervene. This approach aligns with the ethical standards that advocate for minimizing harm while ensuring the journalist's role in serving the public interest is not compromised