Answer :
Final Answer
a) concurring opinion is a written statement by a justice who agrees with the court's decision but offers a distinct perspective.
Therefore, the correct answer is a) Concurring opinion.
Explanation
When a justice feels strongly about emphasizing a particular point that is not accentuated in the unanimous written opinion, they write their own concurring opinion. A concurring opinion is a separate written statement by a justice or judges who agree with the final judgment but wish to express their unique perspective or reasoning on the case.
While the unanimous opinion represents the consensus of the court, a concurring opinion allows a justice to highlight an aspect or legal argument they find important and distinct from the majority opinion. In contrast, a dissenting opinion is written by a justice who disagrees with the majority's decision, and a plurality opinion occurs when no majority opinion garners the support of at least five justices in a divided decision.
Concurring opinions serve to clarify, expound upon, or add depth to the court's decision, shedding light on the nuances and varied interpretations of the law. These opinions provide valuable insights into the legal reasoning of individual justices and can influence future legal discourse. They are an essential component of the United States Supreme Court's decision-making process and the broader judicial system.
Therefore, the correct answer is a) Concurring opinion.
Learn more about Justice
brainly.com/question/32393997
#SPJ11
