Answer :
The question about Benton's specific proposal for improving the Mongolians cannot be answered without further context. Historically, Mongol leaders implemented various improvements to their society, but the question of the world being better or worse off without the Mongols requires a nuanced analysis of their historical impact.
The question you've asked about Benton's proposal for improving the Mongolians doesn't provide enough context from the provided documents to give a precise answer. However, we can infer that any such proposal would be tied to historical actions and policies aimed at the development and improvement of Mongolian society. When studying the broader history of the Mongols, scholars look into various reforms or initiatives instigated by Mongol leaders, such as the introduction of a written language, religious tolerance, trade expansion, and the establishment of legal codes like Chinggis Khan's yassa, which altered traditional Mongol practices.
In considering whether the author believes the world would be better or worse off without the Mongols, we must delve into the historical impact of the Mongol Empire. The Mongol Empire facilitated extensive trade routes, cultural exchange, and created a relatively stable and unified region that could have significant global benefits. However, their conquests also entailed brutality and destruction. Therefore, any conclusion about the world being better or worse off without the Mongols would likely weigh these complex historical outcomes.
Article 2 of the Agreement clarifies that the Agreement is set in the "Sustainable Development Context" and that "actions should be taken in a manner that is not in the" Sustainable Development Context "."
