Answer :
The statement "When an appellate judge disagrees with the result and with the reasoning of the majority opinion, but disagrees with the dissenting opinion as well, she may write and abstaining opinion" is False
False, when an appellate judge disagrees with both the majority opinion and the dissenting opinion, she may write a concurring in part and dissenting in part opinion, not an abstaining opinion.
The judge does this to express her unique perspective on the case that is not fully represented by the majority or dissenting opinions.
An abstaining opinion is not a recognized form of judicial opinion in U.S. law.
Therefore, the claim that a judge would write an 'abstaining opinion' in this case is False.
Learn more about Judicial Opinions here:
https://brainly.com/question/32900797
#SPJ11
