Answer :
Final answer:
The statement is false. Reasonable suspicion and probable cause are two different standards of proof in United States law, with the latter requiring a higher level of suspicion.
Explanation:
The statement is false. There is indeed a difference between reasonable suspicion and probable cause. In the legal domain, reasonable suspicion refers to a legal standard of proof in United States law that is less than probable cause, which is required to justify a police officer's making a warrantless arrest, or conducting a personal or property search. Probable cause on the other hand is a higher level of suspicion—more than a hunch but less than certain knowledge. It refers to a requirement in the law that must usually exisit before a law enforcement officer can make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant. In short, reasonable suspicion is a lower threshold of proof than probable cause.
Learn more about Reasonable Suspicion versus Probable Cause here:
https://brainly.com/question/30081874
#SPJ1
