Answer :
Final answer:
The Terry Stop allows officers to stop and frisk individuals based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, which is a lower standard than probable cause. This Supreme Court ruling impacts the relationship between law enforcement and citizens, providing officers with broad authority to act on suspicions. It highlights the significance of balancing public safety with individual rights.
Explanation:
Terry Stop and Its Implications
The Terry Stop, resulting from the landmark Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio (1968), allows law enforcement to stop and frisk individuals based on reasonable suspicion. This means that officers can briefly detain a person and conduct a limited search for weapons if they have a belief that the person is involved in criminal activity. Notably, this threshold of reasonable suspicion is lower than the standard of probable cause, which is required for obtaining warrants or conducting more extensive searches.
The ruling established that police are not required to have probable cause—that is, a stronger basis of belief that a crime has occurred—before stopping someone. Consequently, the ability to stop and frisk amounts to a significant alteration in the balance of power between citizens and police, emphasizing the importance of reasonable suspicion in day-to-day law enforcement practices.
Learn more about Terry Stop here:
https://brainly.com/question/34238337
