Answer :
Final answer:
The legal standard required to 'stop and frisk' an individual is 'reasonable suspicion'. This is less than 'probable cause', which is needed for an arrest or search warrant. 'Reasonable suspicion' arises from specific and articulated suspicion of criminal activity.
Explanation:
In the context of law enforcement, the degree of proof required to 'stop and frisk' an individual is termed as 'reasonable suspicion'. This legal standard is lesser than 'probable cause', which is needed to make an arrest or obtain a search warrant. 'Reasonable suspicion' as a basis for 'stop and frisk' arises from specific, articulable, and individualized suspicion of criminal activity. It's important to note that this term 'reasonable suspicion' doesn't satisfy the criteria of 'preponderance of the evidence' or 'beyond a reasonable doubt', which are standards used later in the criminal justice process, notably in court proceedings.
Learn more about Stop and Frisk here:
https://brainly.com/question/32258332
#SPJ11
