Answer :
Final answer:
The Federalists sought a strong national government, while the Anti-Federalists feared tyranny from such power. Their debate centered on the balance between societal order and individual freedoms. The eventual compromise included a Bill of Rights, addressing Anti-Federalist concerns.
Explanation:
Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists
The ratification of the Constitution was a pivotal moment in American history, marked by the intense debate between two opposing factions: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists, including prominent figures like James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, advocated for a strong national government that could effectively unify the new nation and address its challenges. They believed that the Constitution was essential for establishing a robust federal authority.
On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists feared that a powerful national government would lead to tyranny, undermining the sovereignty of individual states and the rights of the people. They were particularly concerned about the potential for governmental overreach and the lack of a Bill of Rights to protect individual liberties. The Anti-Federalists argued for a decentralized approach where states held significant power, thus preventing any central authority from imposing tyranny.
This debate encapsulates a fundamental tension in American political thought between the need for societal order and the protection of individual freedoms. Ultimately, the Great Compromise led to the establishment of a bicameral legislature and the addition of the Bill of Rights, which was a direct response to the concerns raised by the Anti-Federalists. This compromise illustrates how the framers of the Constitution sought to balance the desires for a strong national government with the need to safeguard personal rights and state powers.
Learn more about Federalists and Anti-Federalists here:
https://brainly.com/question/29496480
