Answer :
Yes, I would still expect to find reaction time differences between the congruent and incongruent trials because the Stroop effect is primarily related to the interference caused by conflicting information (e.g., word meaning vs. font color).
If we were asked to ignore the color of the font and focus solely on reading the word in such an experiment, we would still likely expect to find reaction time differences between congruent and incongruent trials.
Here's why:
- Automaticity of Reading:
Reading is an automatic and highly practiced cognitive process. When people see a word, they involuntarily and quickly recognize and process the word's meaning. This automaticity occurs without conscious effort.
- Interference in Incongruent Trials:
Incongruent trials introduce interference because the color of the ink contradicts the meaning of the word. Even if you are explicitly told to focus on reading the word, your brain will still process the color information to some extent. This conflicting information will introduce interference, slowing down your reaction time compared to when the word and color match (congruent trials).
- Stroop Effect Persistence:
The Stroop effect is robust and has been demonstrated in numerous studies. It occurs because of the fundamental conflict between two automatic processes: reading and color perception. This conflict is likely to persist even when you are instructed to ignore the color.
Learn more about cognitive processing here:
brainly.com/question/28147250
#SPJ4