Answer :
Final answer:
If Starbucks chooses to purchase a rival coffee shop chain instead of building additional Starbucks shops, it suggests that purchasing and owning the rival's existing shops is more profitable than building new ones.
Explanation:
If Starbucks chooses to purchase a rival coffee shop chain instead of building additional Starbucks shops, it suggests that purchasing and owning the rival's existing shops is more profitable than building new ones. This is because Starbucks has the option to expand its market share and customer base by acquiring existing coffee shop locations and brand recognition. By purchasing a rival chain, Starbucks can immediately gain access to established markets, loyal customers, and an established infrastructure, saving time and resources that would be required to start from scratch. Furthermore, purchasing a rival chain may provide Starbucks with economies of scale, cost savings, and the opportunity to eliminate competition in the market.
Learn more about Profitability of purchasing and owning existing shops versus building new ones here:
https://brainly.com/question/34099939
#SPJ3
If Starbucks opts to purchase a rival coffee shop chain instead of building new shops, it indicates that acquisition is deemed more profitable, providing immediate market access and customer base, and likely to generate better ROI. Strategic factors like the rival chain's market position, cost savings, and synergies may also influence this decision, in line with Starbucks' prior acquisitions like the Seattle Coffee Company in the UK.
If Starbucks chooses to purchase a rival coffee shop chain rather than building additional Starbucks shops, it implies that the company has evaluated the relative profitability and strategic benefits and concluded that acquiring the rival chain offers a more favorable return on investment (ROI).
This decision could stem from various considerations such as the immediate access to established locations, an existing customer base, potential elimination of competition, and synergies in operations that can enhance overall efficiency and profitability.
Purchasing a competitor could also suggest that the rival chain has valuable assets or market position, which Starbucks wants to capitalize on, such as prime locations or strong brand loyalty in certain regions. Additionally, the cost of building new stores, which includes not just construction, but also expenses like marketing to establish a presence in the area, could potentially be higher than taking over existing shops that already have a customer base and brand recognition.
It is also possible that the current market conditions or internal analyses have indicated that expansion through acquisition could provide a faster growth trajectory or better financial results than organic expansion.
This strategic move aligns with Starbucks' earlier decisions in markets like the UK, where the company opted to acquire the Seattle Coffee Company given its established operations and similarities to Starbucks' own business model.
